sâmbătă, 28 februarie 2015

Stolen Picasso Work Is Seized in Newark



A Picasso painting missing from Paris for more than a decade resurfaced in the United States, where it had been shipped under false pretenses as a $37 holiday-themed “art craft.”


The 1911 painting, “La Coiffeuse,” which translates to “The Hairdresser,” was unearthed in December in a FedEx shipment from Belgium to Newark. The canvas had been smuggled out of a storeroom of the Centre Georges Pompidou, the Paris museum and arts center, and its whereabouts had not been known.


On Thursday, Loretta E. Lynch, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, filed a civil complaint to forfeit the Picasso and return it to France.


Its shipping papers described it as a $37 “art craft/toy” and also read “Joyeux Noel,” French for “Merry Christmas.” When federal Customs and Border Protection officials examined the shipment, though, they found the master artist’s work. Department of Homeland Security officials working from Long Island City, Queens, which is within the Eastern District of New York’s jurisdiction, then took over.


The oil painting is owned by the French government; it had been bequeathed to the National Museums of France by one of its former directors. It was last exhibited in Munich in 1998, and then returned to Paris, where it was stored at the Pompidou. Officials there thought it was safe and sound until they received a loan request for it in 2001, searched the storerooms and could not find it. They declared the painting, then valued more than $2.5 million, stolen.


On Dec. 17, someone going by “Robert” with an address in Belgium shipped the painting to a climate-controlled warehouse in Long Island City. The next day, the painting arrived at the Port of Newark and was seized.


French museum officials came to New York last month to examine the painting in person alongside historical records and photographs, and they confirmed that it was “La Coiffeuse.”


Under federal law, imported merchandise can be seized by the government if it was stolen or smuggled.


“The market to sell stolen antiquities in the United States is drying up,” Anthony Scandiffio, deputy special agent in charge of Homeland Security Investigations, which seized the painting after border officials flagged it, said in a statement.




Source link








- http://bit.ly/1DlLLpD

Leonard Nimoy, Spock of ‘Star Trek,’ Dies at 83




Play Video|2:29

The Man Who Was Spock





Leonard Nimoy, the sonorous, gaunt-faced actor who won a worshipful global following as Mr. Spock, the resolutely logical human-alien first officer of the Starship Enterprise in the television and movie juggernaut “Star Trek,” died on Friday morning at his home in the Bel Air section of Los Angeles. He was 83.


His wife, Susan Bay Nimoy, confirmed his death, saying the cause was end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.


Mr. Nimoy announced last year that he had the disease, attributing it to years of smoking, a habit he had given up three decades earlier. He had been hospitalized earlier in the week.


His artistic pursuits — poetry, photography and music in addition to acting — ranged far beyond the United Federation of Planets, but it was as Mr. Spock that Mr. Nimoy became a folk hero, bringing to life one of the most indelible characters of the last half century: a cerebral, unflappable, pointy-eared Vulcan with a signature salute and blessing: “Live long and prosper” (from the Vulcan “Dif-tor heh smusma”).


Mr. Nimoy, who was teaching Method acting at his own studio when he was cast in the original “Star Trek” television series in the mid-1960s, relished playing outsiders, and he developed what he later admitted was a mystical identification with Spock, the lone alien on the starship’s bridge.


Yet he also acknowledged ambivalence about being tethered to the character, expressing it most plainly in the titles of two autobiographies: “I Am Not Spock,” published in 1977, and “I Am Spock,” published in 1995.


In the first, he wrote, “In Spock, I finally found the best of both worlds: to be widely accepted in public approval and yet be able to continue to play the insulated alien through the Vulcan character.”


“Star Trek,” which had its premiere on NBC on Sept. 8, 1966, made Mr. Nimoy a star. Gene Roddenberry, the creator of the franchise, called him “the conscience of ‘Star Trek’ ” — an often earnest, sometimes campy show that employed the distant future (as well as some special effects that appear primitive by today’s standards) to take on social issues of the 1960s.


His stardom would endure. Though the series was canceled after three seasons because of low ratings, a cultlike following — the conference-holding, costume-wearing Trekkies, or Trekkers (the designation Mr. Nimoy preferred) — coalesced soon after “Star Trek” went into syndication.


The fans’ devotion only deepened when “Star Trek” was spun off into an animated show, various new series and an uneven parade of movies starring much of the original television cast, including — besides Mr. Nimoy — William Shatner (as Captain Kirk), DeForest Kelley (Dr. McCoy), George Takei (the helmsman, Sulu), James Doohan (the chief engineer, Scott), Nichelle Nichols (the chief communications officer, Uhura) and Walter Koenig (the navigator, Chekov).


When the director J. J. Abrams revived the “Star Trek” film franchise in 2009, with an all-new cast including Zachary Quinto as Spock, he included a cameo part for Mr. Nimoy, as an older version of the same character. Mr. Nimoy also appeared in the 2013 follow-up, “Star Trek Into Darkness.”


His zeal to entertain and enlighten reached beyond “Star Trek” and crossed genres. He had a starring role in the dramatic television series “Mission: Impossible” and frequently performed onstage, notably as Tevye in “Fiddler on the Roof.” His poetry was voluminous, and he published books of his photography.


He also directed movies, including two from the “Star Trek” franchise, and television shows. And he made records, singing pop songs as well as original songs about “Star Trek,” and gave spoken-word performances — to the delight of his fans and the bewilderment of critics.


But all that was subsidiary to Mr. Spock, the most complex member of the Enterprise crew, who was both one of the gang and a creature apart, engaged at times in a lonely struggle with his warring racial halves.


In one of his most memorable “Star Trek” performances, Mr. Nimoy tried to follow in the tradition of two actors he admired, Charles Laughton and Boris Karloff, who each played a monstrous character — Quasimodo and the Frankenstein monster — who is transformed by love.


In Episode 24, which was first shown on March 2, 1967, Mr. Spock is indeed transformed. Under the influence of aphrodisiacal spores he discovers on the planet Omicron Ceti III, he lets free his human side and announces his love for Leila Kalomi (Jill Ireland), a woman he had once known on Earth. In this episode, Mr. Nimoy brought to Spock’s metamorphosis not only warmth, compassion and playfulness, but also a rarefied concept of alienation.


“I am what I am, Leila,” Mr. Spock declares after the spores’ effect has worn off and his emotions are again in check. “And if there are self-made purgatories, then we all have to live in them. Mine can be no worse than someone else’s.”


Born in Boston on March 26, 1931, Leonard Simon Nimoy was the second son of Max and Dora Nimoy, Ukrainian immigrants and Orthodox Jews. His father worked as a barber.


From the age of 8, Leonard acted in local productions, winning parts at a community college, where he performed through his high school years. In 1949, after taking a summer course at Boston College, he traveled to Hollywood, though it wasn’t until 1951 that he landed small parts in two movies, “Queen for a Day” and “Rhubarb.”


He continued to be cast in little-known movies, although he did presciently play an alien invader in a cult serial called “Zombies of the Stratosphere,” and in 1961 he had a minor role on an episode of “The Twilight Zone.” His first starring movie role came in 1952 with “Kid Monk Baroni,” in which he played a disfigured Italian street-gang leader who becomes a boxer.


Mr. Nimoy served in the Army for two years, rising to sergeant and spending 18 months at Fort McPherson in Georgia, where he presided over shows for the Army’s Special Services branch. He also directed and starred as Stanley in the Atlanta Theater Guild’s production of “A Streetcar Named Desire” before receiving his final discharge in November 1955.


He then returned to California, where he worked as a soda jerk, movie usher and cabdriver while studying acting at the Pasadena Playhouse. He achieved wide visibility in the late 1950s and early 1960s on television shows like “Wagon Train,” “Rawhide” and “Perry Mason.” Then came “Star Trek.”


Mr. Nimoy returned to college in his 40s and earned a master’s degree in Spanish from Antioch University Austin, an affiliate of Antioch College in Ohio, in 1978. Antioch University later awarded Mr. Nimoy an honorary doctorate.


Mr. Nimoy directed the movies “Star Trek III: The Search for Spock” (1984) and “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home” (1986), which he helped write. In 1991, the same year that he resurrected Mr. Spock on two episodes of “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” Mr. Nimoy was also the executive producer and a writer of the movie “Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.”


He then directed the hugely successful comedy “Three Men and a Baby” (1987), a far cry from his science-fiction work, and appeared in made-for-television movies. He received an Emmy nomination for the 1982 movie “A Woman Called Golda,” in which he portrayed the husband of Golda Meir, the prime minister of Israel, who was played by Ingrid Bergman. It was the fourth Emmy nomination of his career — the other three were for his “Star Trek” work — although he never won.


Mr. Nimoy’s marriage to the actress Sandi Zober ended in divorce. Besides his wife, he is survived by his children, Adam and Julie Nimoy; a stepson, Aaron Bay Schuck; six grandchildren and one great-grandchild; and an older brother, Melvin.


Though his speaking voice was among his chief assets as an actor, the critical consensus was that his music was mortifying. Mr. Nimoy, however, was undaunted, and his fans seemed to enjoy the camp of his covers of songs like “If I Had a Hammer.” (His first album was called “Leonard Nimoy Presents Mr. Spock’s Music From Outer Space.”)


From 1977 to 1982, Mr. Nimoy hosted the syndicated series “In Search Of …,” which explored mysteries like the Loch Ness monster and U.F.O.s. He also narrated “Ancient Mysteries” on the History Channel and appeared in commercials, including two with Mr. Shatner for Priceline.com. He provided the voice for animated characters in “Transformers: The Movie,” in 1986, and “The Pagemaster,” in 1994.


In 2001 he voiced the king of Atlantis in the Disney animated movie “Atlantis: The Lost Empire,” and in 2005 he furnished voice-overs for the computer game Civilization IV. More recently, he had a recurring role on the science-fiction series “Fringe” and was heard, as the voice of Spock, in an episode of the hit sitcom “The Big Bang Theory.”


Mr. Nimoy was an active supporter of the arts as well. The Thalia, a venerable movie theater on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, now a multi-use hall that is part of Symphony Space, was renamed the Leonard Nimoy Thalia in 2002.


He also found his voice as a writer. Besides his autobiographies, he published “A Lifetime of Love: Poems on the Passages of Life” in 2002. Typical of Mr. Nimoy’s simple free verse are these lines: “In my heart/Is the seed of the tree/Which will be me.”


In later years, he rediscovered his Jewish heritage, and in 1991 he produced and starred in “Never Forget,” a television movie based on the story of a Holocaust survivor who sued a neo-Nazi organization of Holocaust deniers.


In 2002, having illustrated his books of poetry with his photographs, Mr. Nimoy published “Shekhina,” a book devoted to photography with a Jewish theme, that of the feminine aspect of God. His black-and-white photographs of nude and seminude women struck some Orthodox Jewish leaders as heretical, but Mr. Nimoy asserted that his work was consistent with the teachings of the kabbalah.


His religious upbringing also influenced the characterization of Spock. The character’s split-fingered salute, he often explained, had been his idea: He based it on the kohanic blessing, a manual approximation of the Hebrew letter shin, which is the first letter in Shaddai, one of the Hebrew names for God.


“To this day, I sense Vulcan speech patterns, Vulcan social attitudes and even Vulcan patterns of logic and emotional suppression in my behavior,” Mr. Nimoy wrote years after the original series ended.


But that wasn’t such a bad thing, he discovered. “Given the choice,” he wrote, “if I had to be someone else, I would be Spock.”




Source link








- http://bit.ly/1wxhUO8

India’s New Budget Aims to Boost Growth



NEW DELHI — India’s finance minister, Arun Jaitley, unveiled the first full-year budget of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government on Saturday, promising to boost growth with a major increase in public spending on infrastructure and to lower the corporate tax rate by 5 percent, steps that were cheered by Indian industry.


Those moves were balanced by the relaxation of targets for spending cuts and the introduction of a new social security plan to provide subsidized insurance and pensions for poor Indians.


Though Saturday is usually a trading holiday, India’s financial markets opened for the much-anticipated budget speech, but neither they, nor most analysts, detected the dramatic reforms that some of Mr. Modi’s supporters have been urging.


The speech came against a sunny economic backdrop in India, especially in comparison to other developing economies. The government now predicts a growth rate of 7.4 percent in the current fiscal year, more than 8 percent next year and proceeding to double digits thereafter. Meanwhile, falling commodity prices have helped to curb India’s chronic budget deficits, a development that Raghuram G. Rajan, the governor of the Reserve Bank of India, described as “a $50 billion gift for the economy.”


Mr. Jaitley began his speech on a triumphal note, proclaiming that the government had, “turned around the economy dramatically” and rebuilt India’s reputation with investors.


“The credibility of the Indian economy has been re-established,” Mr. Jaitley said. “The world is predicting that it is India’s chance to fly.”


Ahead of the budget, much tension arose around the question of what was more important: to curb government spending or to spur growth by ramping up public investment, shifting the burden off a heavily indebted private sector and stressed banks.


Saturday’s budget leaned toward the latter, increasing annual spending on roads, ports and railways by 70,000 crore, or about $11.36 billion. It also scaled back goals for spending cuts, increasingly the fiscal deficit target to 3.9 percent of the gross domestic product from 3.9 percent, and slowing the timeline for a reduction to 3 percent by a year.


The combination left most market analysts satisfied.


“This is not a big-bang budget, but a good budget more focused on smaller issues, and ironing out a lot of irritants to investors in the process,” said Sujat Hakra, chief economist at Anand Rathi Financial Services in Mumbai. The slower timeline for spending cuts, he allowed, was “not particularly positive.”


Manmohan Singh, who served as India’s prime minister for 10 years under the Congress Party, faulted the budget as too cautious, arguing that the new government had missed a chance to cut spending or increase tax revenues.


“Mr. Jaitley is a very lucky finance minister,” Mr. Singh told the NDTV news channel. “He has inherited an economy which is in reasonably good shape. Inflation is under control, not because of anything we have done, but because the international prices of petroleum and other commodities have gone down.”


He added, “I had hoped that the finance minister used this lucky phase of his inheritance to give a real big boost to stabilize the economy, strengthen the macroeconomic framework.”


Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party suffered a setback in recent state elections in Delhi, where the upstart Aam Aadmi, or Common Man, party, cast him as indifferent to the needs of the poor. Mr. Jaitley, on Saturday, seemed intent on blunting that accusation. A new subsidized insurance program would provide coverage for accidents or death for 12 rupees, or around 20 cents, a year.


There were no significant changes to India’s colossal subsidy programs for food, fuel or fertilizer, which cost the government around $14 billion a year. The new government hopes to save money by transforming subsidies into cash transfers, a step that could save around $4 billion a year by eliminating corruption, according to the Credit Rating Information Services of India Limited.


“Subsidies are needed for the poor and those less well off,” Mr. Jaitley said. “We need to cut subsidy leakages, not subsidies themselves.”


One way the government intends to increase revenues is by cracking down on tax evasion, which is rampant here. Mr. Jaitley, speaking to a television interviewer after the speech, estimated that the government receives tax payments from only around 35 million Indians, or roughly 3 or 4 percent of the total population.


The new budget proposes a penalty of up to 10 years of “rigorous imprisonment” for concealing assets overseas, and would require citizens to provide a government identification number when making a purchase or sale for more than $1622. A new 2 percent tax will also be levied on the “super-rich,” those with taxable income of more than 1 crore rupees, or $214,431.


Corporate taxes, meanwhile, will drop from 30 percent to 25 percent, which could increase Indian firms’ compliance, said Ajay Bodke, head of investment strategy at Prabhudas Lilladher, a brokerage firm in Mumbai. Previous governments, he said, have given “given extremely aggressive revenue targets to tax officers, who in turn go about raising unreasonable demands.”


“He wants to foster a benign economic environment in which the relationship between the tax assessed and the assessor, which had frayed under the previous regime, is brought to an even keel,” Mr. Bodke said.


Mr. Jaitley set a deadline of April 2016 for a taxation change long sought by investors, which would replace multiple layers of local taxes currently levied at state borders with a national Goods and Services Tax. A constitutional amendment bill for the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax has been introduced in the lower house of parliament, a lack of realistic deadlines or credible information had slowed progress.


Several of the changes most ardently desired by investors could not be achieved in the budget, and instead require Mr. Modi to navigate a polarized legislature.


Among them is the liberalization of a highly restrictive 2013 law governing land purchases, which requires buyers to secure the consent of 80 percent of landowners on the property. Mr. Modi’s government has submitted an executive ordinance that would eliminate the consent clause and the requirement of a social impact assessment if land is to be used in certain ways – for industrial corridors, and affordable housing, among others – but needs the approval of both houses of parliament for it to take effect. The new government has yet to propose changes to India’s stringent labor laws, which has also deterred would-be builders of large factories.




Source link








- http://bit.ly/1zNSFTB

Bits Blog: Uber Driver Database Breached by Someone Outside Company





Source link








- http://bit.ly/1EztmKp

Chris Lightcap, Ben Wendel and Tootie Heath Have New Albums



Chris Lightcap’s Bigmouth


EPICENTER


Fifteen years ago, the bassist Chris Lightcap released an auspicious debut album, “Lay-Up,” involving a nonstandard quartet configuration with two tenor saxophones up front. Mr. Lightcap still hasn’t exhausted that format: “Epicenter” (Clean Feed), due out on Wednesday, is his fourth album to feature it — and by and large his best, which is saying something. It comprises a batch of tunes Mr. Lightcap wrote as a commission, “New York: Lost and Found,” tailored to Bigmouth, his longtime band. The saxophonists are Tony Malaby and Chris Cheek; the rhythm section includes Craig Taborn on acoustic and Wurlitzer pianos and Gerald Cleaver on drums. Mr. Lightcap has a fondness for interlocking parts and a frame of reference that runs from West African music (as in the vamp that slowly materializes in “Stone by Stone”) to the Velvet Underground (as in a potent “All Tomorrow’s Parties,” the lone cover). You could listen to this album and fixate on the contrasting tenor styles: drier and more linear for Mr. Cheek, harder and blurrier for Mr. Malaby. But these musicians all have endless history together, and their total cohesion, with its earthy elasticity, feels like the larger point.


Ben Wendel


THE SEASONS


A tenor saxophonist, bassoonist and composer with an unassuming breadth of style, Ben Wendel has made a subspecialty out of duologue, recently and notably with the pianist Dan Tepfer. For his new project — “The Seasons,” inspired by the Tchaikovsky piano suite of the same name — Mr. Wendel is unveiling a new duet every month this year, with video freely available at benwendel.com/theseasons. He conceived each piece with a handpicked collaborator in mind, like the pianist Taylor Eigsti, whose playing on “January” suggests a swirl of deft angularities and busy composure. “February,” which was posted on Feb. 23, is a more driving proposition: Mr. Wendel and one of his saxophone influences, Joshua Redman, dart through its syncopated form with an intense but collegial give and take. Both videos spotlight terrifically assured performances with sharp production values, raising expectations for Mr. Wendel’s 10 remaining installments, with partners yet to be revealed.


Tootie Heath, Ethan Iverson, Ben Street


PHILADELPHIA BEAT


Albert Heath, better known in jazz circles as Tootie, is a drummer whose cadence and bearing were forged during bebop’s second wave, roughly 60 years ago. Now 79, he has a good thing in his trio with the pianist Ethan Iverson and the bassist Ben Street, insightful musicians a few decades his junior. “Philadelphia Beat,” due out on Sunnyside on Tuesday, is their third album, at once an act of historical preservation and an argument against sanctimony. Half of its tracks are standards like the Benny Harris tune “Reets and I,” unpacked with casual flair. But there’s also a fond interpretation of a Bach cantata; a scrap from a book of scalar patterns by Yusef Lateef, one of Mr. Heath’s former bandleaders; and dry readings of both a disco touchstone (“I Will Survive”) and a crossover soul ballad (“Everything Must Change”), with tactics that faintly evoke Mr. Iverson’s main outlet, the Bad Plus. The album’s title is a nod to the regional signature that Mr. Heath, through all of his travels, has managed never to leave behind. (His trio performs Tuesday through next Sunday at the Village Vanguard, villagevanguard.com.)


Jo Lawry


TAKING PICTURES


Jo Lawry came across as a jazz singer of dazzling self-possession on her 2008 debut, “I Want to Be Happy.” If you’ve seen her onstage since then, there’s a decent chance it was in the company of Sting, as a featured member of his band. “Taking Pictures” (Fleurieu), Ms. Lawry’s overdue second album, reflects this shift, convincingly reframing her as a singer-songwriter in an adult-contemporary mode. Most of her tunes are chronicles of love and the risks taken therein: On “Ready Aim Fire” and “I Said No,” she takes cold responsibility for a relationship’s end. But Ms. Lawry is still as much of an optimist as she is a perfectionist, and most of these love songs find her marveling at her good fortune. Musically she’s in excellent company, including a few singers — Alan Hampton, Theo Bleckmann and, on a tune that feels tailored to him, Sting — who amplify her sunny prowess.


Anouar Brahem


SOUVENANCE


The Tunisian oud master Anouar Brahem has long favored chamber-like settings, but he’d never composed for strings before making his new album, “Souvenance” (ECM). Indirectly inspired by the sociopolitical upheavals in his country over the last five years, the album assumes a muted cinematic sweep, with scant harmonic movement but a wealth of shifting texture. Mr. Brahem enlisted several veteran collaborators — the pianist François Couturier, the bass clarinetist Klaus Gesing and the bassist Björn Meyer — along with the Orchestra della Svizzera italiana, conducted by Pietro Mianiti. The oud playing is infallibly strong, but some of the album’s more striking moments belong to Mr. Gesing, who knows how to suggest the strain of a human voice. Spread across two CDs, this is a work of tensile beauty, by turns hopeful and foreboding.




Source link








- http://bit.ly/1LVIUs7

National Briefing | Health: Death Toll From C. Difficile Is Raised



Clostridium difficile is estimated to have afflicted almost half a million Americans and caused 29,000 deaths in 2011, according to a new study.









Source link








- http://bit.ly/1AlFR5N

Review: ‘Ghosts’ of the Guillotine Reunite at Versailles



LOS ANGELES — I once met a woman who had worked in finance during what she called the “go-go 1980s.” “Lots of zeros, lots,” she said with a smile and not a little relish, recalling the size of the salaries.


“The Ghosts of Versailles,” currently being performed at the Los Angeles Opera, may well have been the epitome of lots-of-zeros, go-go opera. An extravagantly fanciful riff on “The Guilty Mother,” the little-read final play in Beaumarchais’ 18th-century “Figaro” trilogy, it was conceived at the end of the 1970s by the composer John Corigliano and the librettist William H. Hoffman.


After gestating over the next decade, the work finally had its premiere at the Metropolitan Opera in December 1991, eight years later than originally planned. But “Ghosts” made up for lost time with sheer size: a vast chorus, a hulking set and an onstage orchestra in addition to the one in the pit.


While a pared-down arrangement has had some success in recent years, it’s no surprise that with opera’s cash-flush ’80s long over, productions of the full-scale work have been few and far between. A planned Met revival was canceled after the Great Recession began.


The Los Angeles Opera’s run of the full original version, seen on Thursday, is therefore not just a rare opportunity to take stock of an important modern score. It is also a de facto memorial to an entire operatic ethos, exemplified by the lavish productions of Franco Zeffirelli, that’s now vanished about as completely as the guillotined aristocrats who give “Ghosts” its title. Does the work, conjuring up those long-ago days, feel as if it has too many zeros for 2015?


That the answer is no is largely because of the production’s conductor, James Conlon, and its director, Darko Tresnjak, a Tony Award winner last year for “A Gentleman’s Guide to Love & Murder.” While “Ghosts” is still a grandiose endeavor, Mr. Conlon and Mr. Tresnjak, an excellent cast and an inspired design team reveal a clearer, lighter, brighter work than the one seen at the Met nearly 25 years ago, at least as it was captured then on video.


Not that “Ghosts” has lost its convolutions, with worlds colliding within it, sometimes confusingly. There is the present day, in which the very deceased Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, Beaumarchais and their patrician compatriots have gathered at Versailles as ghosts. Then there is the opera inside the opera, loosely based on “The Guilty Mother,” which features the characters familiar from “The Barber of Seville” and “The Marriage of Figaro,” still scheming, a couple of decades later and a good deal more bitter.


Beaumarchais has planned the show to try to spare Marie Antoinette, whom he adores, from the French Revolution’s wrath, using the power of art to change the course of history. That revolutionary history itself enters the picture as the story deepens.


Mr. Corigliano handles the complex interplay of these different levels with admirable craftsmanship. The ghosts inhabit an eerily ethereal sphere of dissonant slides and sudden brassy jags, while Beaumarchais’ production features agile pastiches of the rollicking energy and aching lyricism of Mozart’s “The Marriage of Figaro” and Rossini’s “The Barber of Seville.” The Revolution is a grim, simmering sonic landscape. (This may not be the opera for you if republicanism is your thing.)


The libretto is similarly polished. The camp and winking jokes — a Wagnerian soprano interloper, in breastplate and horns, brings down the Act I curtain — are precisely balanced by moments of earnest savagery or tenderness.


It’s all well calibrated. The trouble is that there’s not much of a payoff, other than a few chuckles and admiration for the creators’ diligent, ultimately safe, conservative work. “Ghosts” is surely ambitious, but in size, not surprise.


For a piece in which emotions ostensibly run high — everyone, as usual in opera, is always in love or in hate with everyone else — the emotional power is strangely muted. Marie Antoinette, the central figure (here the sympathetic soprano Patricia Racette), never quite comes to life — or death. While her ghost bemoans, at great length, her execution and longs to be revived, it’s hard to care either way, since her character lacks texture and personality.


Her love duets with Beaumarchais (the slyly articulate, resonant baritone Christopher Maltman) drag, one extreme of the score’s tonal shifts, which can feel less like variety than whiplash. A scene of farce gets the blood flowing before the focus returns to the ghosts and the pace slows to a crawl.


The comic, quick-moving passages were the most effective in Thursday’s performance, perhaps because Mr. Tresnjak is savvy about organizing chaos. Act I closes with a long, riotous scene at the Turkish embassy that went more swiftly than it had at the Met. It didn’t hurt that the juicy cameo role of the entertainer Samira, created at the Met by the great mezzo-soprano Marilyn Horne, had gone to the Broadway diva Patti LuPone, who dispatched her pseudo-exotic number with daffy charm.


The baritone Lucas Meachem is a lively Figaro, and the tenor Joshua Guerrero a warm-toned Count Almaviva. Guanqun Yu’s coolly penetrating soprano emphasizes the Countess’s reserve, while Robert Brubaker glowers convincingly as the work’s villain, Bégearss. Mr. Conlon does his best to aerate and focus the score, but it still feels meandering and flat.


What poignancy the opera does have comes in large part from a specter never mentioned in its libretto: the AIDS epidemic. As they developed the piece, both creators addressed the crisis explicitly elsewhere (Mr. Corigliano in his Symphony No. 1 and Mr. Hoffman in his play “As Is”), but I don’t think they entirely ignored it in “Ghosts.” What else is the work but a melancholy longing for a time before a bloody massacre?


That the opera needs this outside assistance, as it were, to make its impact marks it as less a significant, permanent addition to the repertory than an evocation of a particular moment: the 1980s. It bears intriguing if, in the end, inert witness to both that decade’s absurd profligacy and its unimaginable losses.




Source link








- http://bit.ly/1ATHSd7